Calling Out Climate Central Fraud

Climate Central says that summer maximum temperatures in St. Paul, Minnesota are going to increase by 12 degrees over the next 84 years.

Screenshot 2016-01-29 at 09.59.49 PM

Blistering Future Summers for 1,001 U.S. Cities | Climate Central

This is a total fraud. There has been no change in St. Paul summer temperatures over the last 70 years (i.e. Bette Midler’s lifetime.)

Screenshot 2016-01-30 at 07.13.31 AM

They claim that Omaha will warm 11 degrees.

Screenshot 2016-01-29 at 11.59.50 PM

Omaha summers are cooling, and are more than 5F cooler than they were in the 1930s.

Screenshot 2016-01-29 at 11.59.31 PMScreenshot 2016-01-30 at 07.10.40 AM

They claim that Harrisburg, Pennsylvania will warm 11 degrees.

Screenshot 2016-01-30 at 12.20.22 AMScreenshot 2016-01-30 at 12.20.06 AM

In fact, they have cooled.

Screenshot 2016-01-30 at 07.11.58 AM

Bottom line is that Climate Central is committing fraud. There is no legitimate basis for their claims.

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to Calling Out Climate Central Fraud

  1. It’s snowing today here in Scotland – as it has done almost every or perhaps every year since the notorious: “children won’t know what snow is”. The only difference is that we are now paying a lot more to heat our house in the cold weather because of this evil scam.

  2. gator69 says:

    I think I may have found the problem…

    Summers in most of the U.S. are already warmer than they were in the 1970s. And climate models tell us that summers are going to keep getting hotter as greenhouse gas emissions continue.

    According to this model, heavier-than-air human flight is impossible.

  3. markstoval says:

    All the climate con-artists “scientists” have is claims. I was taught that science was much more than making wild claims; but then I was trained in normal-science times and not the modern post-normal times. (or is it post-science?)

    • Jason Calley says:

      It is even worse than that. They make unsubstantiated claims, and on the rare occasion that a claim becomes true, they shout that the claim was a prediction. When the claim does not come to pass they say (if pressed), “That was not a prediction, no, not a prediction at all! That was a scenario, just one of many possible outcomes.”

      Modern CAGW theory cannot be falsified no matter what happens.

      • Modern CAGW theory cannot be falsified no matter what happens.

        True but it doesn’t matter. I tried that line of argument with CAGW believers among my friends and neighbors. They say deniers are anti-science so I thought I had a ringer in asking them how their beloved scientific hypothesis could be falsified.

        It doesn’t work. They don’t know what falsification means. They think it’s some kind of reactionary trick I am trying on them and get very suspicious. I think they will redouble their efforts to counter dangerous individuals like me.

  4. eliza says:

    Some major climatic fraud uncovered by the master himself
    http://climateaudit.org/2016/01/29/cherry-picking-by-darrigo/

  5. Freddie Stoller, Davos, Switzerland says:

    You don’t understand!!! it is like with Schrödingers cat, it only happens if you are not watching!

  6. gator69 says:

    Move over Anthropocene, you’ve been replaced…

  7. Luke of the D says:

    Even if they are right… would this be bad? Could you imagine if the northern States and Canada were as warm as Texas?! IMAGE THE CROPLAND! We could feed the entire world several times over if we reached a temperatures as warm as they predict! How would that be bad?

    • Doug says:

      Exactly. Their reference to Omaha is Harlingen, TX. Farms around Harlingen produce two crops per year. Imagine if Nebraska farms could get their grain in by July and then produce a winter crop. Too bad it’s a pipe dream.

  8. Andy DC says:

    You negative cherry picked your Minneapolis chart! You started it right after the extreme heat of 1934 and 1936, which if included in the chart, would have made your case look significantly stronger. You must have done so out of pity for the poor alarmists that you have eviscerated and bitch slapped so mercilessly over all these years.

  9. Climate Central receives taxpayer funding. Wouldn’t lying under the circumstances be considered wire fraud? http://www.climatecentral.org/what-we-do/funding

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s