The Biggest Scam In Science HIstory

In 1999, NASA’s James Hansen showed about 0.4C global warming from 1880 through the late 1990’s, for rural, small town and urban areas.

Screenshot 2016-04-15 at 10.46.06 AM-down

1999_Hansen_etal_1.pdf

NASA now shows three times that much global warming (1.2C) from 1880 through the late 1990’s.

Fig.A (3)

Fig.A.gif (656×446)

It is bad enough that NASA tripled 1880-1998 global warming by altering the data, but when we consider that NOAA’s Tom Karl said the planet cooled from 1921 to 1979, it becomes painfully obvious that we are dealing with the biggest scam in science history.

Image-131-1 (1)

7 Dec 1989, Page 14 – at Newspapers.com

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

22 Responses to The Biggest Scam In Science HIstory

  1. omanuel says:

    The scam began after nations and national Academies of Sciences were united on24 OCT 1945 to hide the source of energy in atomic bombs and stars from the public and thus SAVE THE WORLD FROM NUCLEAR ANNIHILATION !

    My attempt to peacefully end seventy years of deception was delayed when someone else “withdrew” the paper submitted to Nature on “Solar energy” on 15 March 2016.

    https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Solar_Energy2.pdf

    The London GeoEthics Conference that Swedish Professor Nils-Axel Mörner organized for 8-9 September 2016:

    https://geoethic.com/london-conference-2016/

    will hopefully bring a peaceful and final conclusion to this issue by helping society re-establish contact with reality.

  2. Neal S says:

    To me it seems clear that there must be some combination of lying and/or incompetence, previously and/or now. If there is any other explanation for this discrepancy, I am certainly eager to learn of it. How else would the current temperature record be so at odds with the previous temperature record, from the SAME organization?

  3. cdqgfj says:

    So this tampering of the temperature-record caused the widespread melting of mountain glaciers, mass-loss from ice sheets, loss of Arctic sea ice and bid reductions of Northern Hemisphere snow cover? Wow.

    • pmc47025 says:

      Glaciers have been mostly melting for the previous 14,000 (or so) years. I doubt the recent temperature record conjuring would have a significant effect on glacial melt.

    • gator69 says:

      Idiot, we have been through this before.

      If I take an ice cube out of my freezer and place it on my kitchen counter it will continue to melt, even if I turn the thermostat down a few degrees.

      At this point, we know that you are a liar, an idiot, or both.

    • RAH says:

      What I can’t figure out about these warmists is how the claim to know so much and yet don’t seem to understand that they live on a dynamic ever changing planet despite the massive amount of evidence that demonstrates that. Nothing is forever on this earth. And the whole scam is based on the idea that natural variability is virtually non existent.

      • gator69 says:

        That is why a healthy background in geology is essential for understanding climate change, and this temporary rock we call home. One of the first things you learn as a geology student is that there are no permanent features on, or in, our planet.

        Alarmists remind me of creationists. They cast aside any science that disagrees with their ideology.

    • AndyG55 says:

      Retreating since when

      Oh.. you mean since 1979 as part of the NATURAL cycle

  4. cdqgfj says:

    Greenland was not losing mass before the mid 1990’s or so. WAIS also started losing mass recently together with the Antarctic Peninsula. If warming continues WAIS will inevitably collapse causing a few meters of extra sea level rise…

  5. GalfromMass says:

    Now our government under the Dear Leader wants to prosecute scientists and I guess everyone else that does not believe in climate change/global warming. NASA and Dear Leader want to jail people for making movies to inform the public of the truth. There is a name for that, it’s called a Dictatorship.

    All this data altering, shouldn’t they go to jail? We know which way quite a lot of these people lean. I’m sure not getting any bang for my tax bucks, mandatorily taken from me year after year to support these FRAUDS. Maybe it is time for NASA and others of that ilk to be tossed into the dustbin of history.

    I hope that this madness will end or at least begin to subside, and that sanity will return in 279 days, 03 hours, 49 minutes and 26 seconds.

  6. Philip Shehan says:

    Your graph of Giss data is for meteorological stations. That is land based data. Here is the NASA Gistemp global data land and ocean data with yearly and 5 year smoothing to 2000.

    http://woodfortrees.org/plot/gistemp/mean:12/to:2000/plot/gistemp/mean:60/to:2000

    It is essentially the same as the adjusted global data in the first graphs at the top.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s