4.11 Conclusions and Recommendations
the performance of current global climate models has shown that there is considerable skill in the simulation of the present day climate by atmospheric general circulation models
You can see their skill here :
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
gelcarrion0t on Australia Permanent Drought Up… gelcarrion0t on “New computer modeling… Morgan Wright on Climate Destroying Shrimp Christopher Simpson on 1896 : Japan Hit By Earthquake… energywise on What’s At Stake? Robert Cherba on Too Hot To Live gelcarrion0t on Too Hot To Live Nicholas McGinley on “The world began to end… Nicholas McGinley on “The world began to end… Nicholas McGinley on “The world began to end…
Skillful at what? Producing more fear and funding?
This whole debacle may turn out to be one of the greatest sources in the study of shortcomings of human nature. We have had many before—-Witch Trials, eugenics, McCarthyism, Spanish inquisition, and on and on, however, worldwide organizations, worldwide media, errant NGO’s, seclusion from reality of many in ivory towers, and more, all of which thrive on negativism and abundant financial resources have made the current AGW, now CAGW religion more penetrating
and insular. In many circles it is a crime even to question it. It should be considered a blessing that the earth has not warmed, instead there is a rising and desperate chorus of ad hominem attacks. Stay cool earth!!!
Darryl,
McCarthy was irrefutably right. Here’s an expert’s deep dive into the records. Stan Evans shows that McCarthy’s problem was not that he was alarmist, but that he underestimated the problem.
The people who created the meme of “McCarthyism” are the political forebears of the AGW anit-capitalists who have created the meme of “climate deniers.”
Don’t fall into their trap.
Details on Evan’s book: http://www.amazon.com/Blacklisted-History-Senator-McCarthy-Americas/dp/1400081068
Kent Clizbe
Thanks Kent—-I will check it out
Maybe McCarthy was right.
Steve you are being disingenuous. It takes a tremendous amount of skill to run such a successful racketeering tax siphoning exercise on a global scale and keep up the pretence despite the walls caving in. The mafia would be proud…oh hang on didn’t they siphon green funds in Italy?
We will look back in years to come and wonder at how such a massive criminal enterprise existed, but quietly laud the gargantuan effort it took to maintain for so long in face of the reality in respect to the stench of being told more snow means it’s warmer or how Hansen & Mann were not imprisoned for fraud. More importantly historians may question how a populace could be so incredibly blinkered to make Chicken Little president. 😉
Comical Ali
Germany pretends to be a pioneer in the green revolution. But Germans are pumping more climate-killing CO2 into the air than they have in years.
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/commentary-why-germany-is-waging-its-green-revolution-wrong-a-929693.html
Well the UK govt. is finally going to allow the building of a Nuke Plant(maybe two) but they have guaranteed the French company that will be building/operating the nuke plant twice today’s going rate for the electricity that it will be producing. Sounds to me like the rate payers are going to be screwed even more.
[ Because the government has maintained all along that it will not provide any public subsidies to the nuclear industry. It would not actually be illegal to do so, but the coalition would need permission from the European Union. Any such u-turn would be hugely embarrassing, however, not to mention hugely unpopular.
In essence, the government has guaranteed EDF a price of £92.50 per megawatt hour (Mwh), so if the market price of electricity falls below this level, the government has in effect said it will make sure EDF receives the difference between the two prices.
The wholesale price of electricity at the moment is about £45/Mwh. If the wholesale price remains at this level, then EDF will receive an additional £47.50/Mwh. In practice, this money will not come from taxpayers (that would count as a subsidy), but from consumers of electricity. ]
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-22772441
This is big. Though some charts do a more obvious job showing the huge huge disparity between the out of control hockey stick style projections of the dummy climate models and the actual reality of situation: flatline temperatures! For example, the chart in this article is good: http://www.cfact.org/2013/07/02/climate-models-fail-to-match-real-world-temperatures/
Or the graphic in this: http://www.drroyspencer.com/2013/06/still-epic-fail-73-climate-models-vs-measurements-running-5-year-means/
Shock News: Global Warming enters the Twilight Zone!
“and try to help people suffering from the horrendous NSW bushfires, in feeling deep concern about climate change we are moving on to another dimension.”
http://www.thecourier.com.au/story/1865184/cause-of-fires-should-be-seen-in-a-global-context/?cs=64
Australia PM Tony Abbott: Climate Change-Wildfire Connection Is ‘Complete Hogwash.’
“That is complete hogwash,” Prime Minister Tony Abbott told News Corp. Australian newspapers in an interview published on Friday.
It certainly is hogwash.
Meanwhile in Siberia, snow cover at record high for October.
http://blogs.channel4.com/liam-dutton-on-weather/northerly-wind-bring-chill-week/5054
Climate models are great at their intended purpose, to show catastrophic warming, which in turn generates more funding. Whether the warming acutally takes place is totally coincidental.
Of course the model are skillful as they are put together by the world’s best chemists, physicists, statisticians, & mathematicians advising the climate scientists and professional programmers. These models have been fully verified and validated by outside professional bodies, and kept updated as new measured and verified data comes. They are now able to accurately track, and forecast likely future events with a high degree precision.
Believe any of that and I’ve a bridge to sell to you
Hey, hey, hey, stop everybody! Whoa! Just hold on.
Take a look at the y-axis. Do you all mean to tell me we can (actually) measure earth’s temperature to a sensitivity of 0.2 degree C? Really.
I call BS.
Man Made Global Warming measured in increments of 0.2 degrees C? Sorry. Too anal retentive.
I want to see a resolution/sensitivity of 2 degree C.
I want to see when the Arctic will totally melt out, I mean no ice whatsoever, so we can ship through there and mine there. My prediction: Polar bears/seals et al will do fine; indigenous peoples (incidentally; I am a scholar of indigenous languages) will do fine – warm is good. Always is for life.
But mostly I just want to see some model that actually predicts what is happening. After all, as an American tax payer, I am funding all this.
“After all, as an American tax payer, I am funding all this.”
You’re 17 TRILLION dollars in the hole – and you’re worried about this little speed bump on the highway of life?
The versions of Hadcrut and UAH in the graph don’t look like the ones I’ve seen before. There’s not much of a peak in ’98, and the steady incline after certainly doesn’t show so much of an hiatus.