Understanding The 97% Consensus

It turns out that 97% of IPCC scientists are actually government officials.

Prof Stavins, Harvard’s Professor of Business and Government, was one of two ‘co-ordinating lead authors’ of a key report published by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) earlier this month.

Prof Stavins told The Mail on Sunday yesterday that he had been especially concerned by what happened at a special ‘contact group’. He was one of only two scientists present, surrounded by ‘45 or 50’ government officials.

Three quarters of the original version of the document ended up being deleted.

Top climate expert’s sensational claim of government meddling in crucial UN report | Mail Online

The government officials tell the scientists what to write in the IPCC report. Then the same officials use the fake IPCC report (which they wrote) as evidence to support of their political agenda.

This corruption is straight out of North Korea, or the Soviet Union.

About these ads

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Understanding The 97% Consensus

  1. Morgan says:

    The IPCC has done this since the beginning. The good news is the fact that he reported it and published it in a place where it won’t be whitewashed. Everybody knew the Summary For Policy Makers was bogus.

  2. fred w says:

    How can you allow Monsanto too advertise on this site? I was in 97%agreement with this site , after seeing a Monsanto ad here , Everything is in question.

  3. gettimothy says:

    This corruption is straight out of North Korea, or the Soviet Union.
    ..or Washington DC.

  4. TB says:

    The conclusion is evident in the name: International Panel on Climate Change. It’s not the International Panel on Climate Study… or Climate Awareness… or Climate Science. The name IS the foregone conclusion… so why shouldn’t their “science” be a foregone conclusion?

  5. Jbird says:

    I expected nothing less. The US should have pulled out of the UN and withdrawn its funding a long time ago.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s