Why Hansen Had To Corrupt The Temperature Record

The two graphs below show what temperatures used to look like in the US and Iceland, before they were tampered with at GISS. The 1930s was the hottest decade, and temperatures were declining. This disproved Hansen’s theories, so he had to get rid of the graphs.

The blink comparators below show how Hansen got rid of those unwanted cooling trends.

Our lukewarm friends say that GISS data is all good, which means that the Earth is both warming and cooling at the same time.

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

22 Responses to Why Hansen Had To Corrupt The Temperature Record

  1. Tomwys says:

    I hope an explanation by GISS for the “adjustments” will be forthcoming, as it is surely warranted!

    • gator69 says:

      They have their excuses which are published along with the massaged data. Read it only if you want your head to hurt worse than it does looking at these graphs.

  2. Mariana Torres says:

    Tomwys no they wont they never will they are beholden to no one. The guy should definitely be held to account when the powers to be realize they’ve been had major wise

  3. tckev says:

    Idiot adjustments made by a man that utterly debases NASA and all it stands for.

  4. Jimmbbo says:

    As if NASA hasn’t been embarrassed enough by being turned into the “Muslim Feel Good and Meals on Wheels Association” and being forced OUT of the manned space mission by the incompetent Community Organizer in Chief, Hansen drags it furtther into the mud with his “If you don’t like the answer, FUDGE the data” approach…

  5. Andy DC says:

    Hansen is no less corrupting than your worst Mafia boss.

  6. scizzorbill says:

    Whatever it takes to agree with the AGW agenda; Hansen will do it.

  7. john dees says:

    Are you people serious? Why dont you check out the study that the Koch Brothers funded? They wanted this Berkley scientist to agree with you…they PAID him to disprove climate change….and he returned with a report that said the EARTH IS DEFINATELY WARMING. Hansen is not the only scientist telling the truth….Like 99% of the climate scientists and geologists on the PLANET say the planet is warming. The other 1% work for Big Oil and say what they are PAID to say. Give it up. You’re hurting everyone with this disinformation.

    • John,

      I have presented a simple and straightforward analysis of data from the GISS website. Do you have any comment about the data, or are you only interested in gossip? I really have no idea who the Koch brothers are, and Muller made no attempt to evaluate if the data had been altered – which is the topic of this post. Everyone agrees that the altered data shows warming, so what is your point?

    • LLAP says:

      @John: You warmists are so predictable. Anything that contradicts AGW must be funded by the Koch brothers or Big Oil who are evil, thereby making that reserach wrong. Never mind facts, just guilt by association. By the way, if you think Hansen is telling the truth, keep this in mind – he is an anti-coal activist. Do you really think he is going to be objective in his science when he injects so much activist politics into it?

    • Jimmbbo says:

      psst… the point is that the earth is NOT WARMING….NO increase as forecast by the hallowed IPCC models, or as shrieked in Algore and Hansen’s outrageous claims.

      What you demonstrate is the sad application of an ancient debate trick long worn out by the loony left… If the facts don’t support your position, attack your opponent… Since the facts SELDOM support their positions, they employ it regularly, along with other Alinsky tools of isolation and ridicule…

    • Russell C says:

      “ … The other 1% work for Big Oil and say what they are PAID to say …”

      As I have written in 40+ online articles and blogs about that very accusation…… two words: Prove it. Fail to do so, and potentially the entire idea of AGW blows up.

      “Global Warming’s Killer: Critical Thinking” http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/06/global_warmings_killer_critical_thinking.html

  8. jimmbbo says:

    @ anton
    Thanks for the clear demonstration of the warmists’ command of logic and the English language… when you can’t argue the facts, attack your opponent… Saul Alinsky would be proud!

  9. stiles77 says:

    Wow! You guys must be the only ones left holding onto the truth about global warming. Don’t be discouraged by the alarming temperature spikes all around the world or the extreme weathure events. Keep playing those violins.

  10. Allan says:

    Having worked in a major University I can attest to the fact that many ‘ researchers’ are making huge amounts of money for what they freely admitted to me was a huge scam. One freely admitted that he had to keep 53 researchers employed and the Global Warming Scam finance was a bottomless pit of money – purely politically driven. So wake up world and stop the guilt trip and self flaggelation. Get on with life and see everything grow better as the natural sun cycle will produce more carbon dioxide for those awful trees and crops to grow faster and better

  11. Gail Combs says:

    John Dees,
    #1. Muller was NEVER a skeptic

    “Let me be clear. My own reading of the literature and study of paleoclimate suggests strongly that carbon dioxide from burning of fossil fuels will prove to be the greatest pollutant of human history. It is likely to have severe and detrimental effects on global climate.” – Richard Muller, 2003″

    “If Al Gore reaches more people and convinces the world that global warming is real, even if he does it through exaggeration and distortion – which he does, but he’s very effective at it – then let him fly any plane he wants.” – Richard Muller, 2008

    So Muller has ZERO problem with lying if it is ‘effective’
    “2. Muller is actually working hand in glove with SHELL OIL. Richard Muller is President and Chief Scientist of Muller & Associates. BTW, a privately held company is an excellent way to hide BRIBES AS CONSULTING FEES!

    If you then go to the listing of the TEAM at Muller Assoc.
    you find. Arthur Rosenfeld, Former California Energy Commissioner among others.

    Further down you find Marlan Downey
    Click on Marlan Downey, Oil and Gas Executive
    And guess what ? We find SHELL OIL!
    “Marlan Downey, Oil and Gas Executive
    ….. Former President of the international subsidiary of Shell Oil…..”

    We also find Muller & Associates is pushing ‘Sustainability” aka Agenda 21.

    “…Muller & Associates provides expertise for energy challenges that deserve the best minds in the world. Our senior-level team includes Nobel Laureates, MacArthur Geniuses, and recognized global leaders with experience in over 30 countries. We integrate science with business acumen, economics, and long-term trends to ensure that our clients are making the right investments for their organization.

    We know that in order to be effective, solutions must be sustainable
    and we know that for businesses, sustainable solutions must be profitable as well.

    GreenGov™ is a service offered by Muller & Associates for Governments, International Organizations, non profits, and other organizations that work with Government….

    Here is a lesbian liberal bureaucrat’s clarification on just what ‘Sustainability actually means: SUSTAINABLE FUTURE

    So, WHY is the SHELL OIL connection important?

    Shell Oil (and BP) have been pushing global warming since day one when they provided the initial funding for the Climate Research Unit of East Anglia. It will be a real money maker. Tear out the old infrastructure and replace with Natural gas, Solar and Wind. A new twist on ‘the broken window fallacy’ where the entire country has to shell out to pay for replacing the ‘window’ the energy sector is so busy breaking. And of course the banksters will LEND the (printed out of thin air) money to do the replacement. Money AND INTEREST that will be paid back through years and years of labor from the poor and middle class. link

    Agenda 21 – 4. Sustainable Development (B1), was written by a SHELL OIL VP, Ged Davis, Davis is the IPCC lead author for scenarios. SEE:e-mail containing Ged Davis scenarios: link

    To quote from Ge Davis’s Sustainable Development (B1) section:

    “…The impact of environmental concerns is a significant factor in the planning for new energy systems. Two alternative energy systems, leading to two sub-scenarios, are considered to provide this energy:

    1. Widespread expansion of natural gas, with a growing role for renewable energy (scenario B1N). Oil and coal are of lesser importance, especially post-2050. This transition is faster in the developed than in the developing countries…”

    Another Shell Oil exec (also World Bank)
    Doug McKay was from Shell Oil and at the scenario meetings. (Climategate e-mail Meeting Notice) (McKay was also Senior Financial Analyst with the World Bank)

    Robert Watson was IPCC chair while working for the World Bank. From the Guardian: Copenhagen climate summit in disarray after ‘Danish text’ leak Developing countries react furiously to leaked draft agreement… The draft hands effective control of climate change finance to the World Bank;…”

    If we follow the Shell Oil connection, we find Queen Beatrix of the Dutch House of Orange and Lord Victor Rothschild are the two largest shareholders of RD/Shell. (I read some where the Dutch Royal family owns about 25%) The British Royals also own a healthy chunk of Shell. Prince Bernhard of the Dutch Royal Family is heavily tied to the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) as is Prince Philip, who was the first President of World Wildlife Fund. Not to mention John H. Loudon, Better known as “the Grand Old Man of Shell” John H. Loudon, a Dutchman, headed Royal Dutch Shell from 1951 to 1965 and he was President of WWF from 1976 to 1981.

    David Hone is not only SHELL OIL’S Senior Climate Change Adviser he is also Chairman of the International Emissions Trading Association. He and his mentor James Smith. SHELL OIL’S previous UK Chairman took SHELL very deeply into Carbon Trading.

    Don’t forget that the IPCC used a lot of WWF ‘gray literature’ in their reports. IPCC chair Pachauri said: “everything that we look at and take into acount in our assessments has to carry the credibility of peer-reveiwed publications, we don’t settle for anything less than that.” yet a Citizen Audit found: “Of the 18531 references in the 2007 Climate Bible we found 5,587 – a full 30% – to be non peer-reviewed.”
    Gets positively incestuous doesn’t it?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s