And if you only looked at the clock at 2:43, you’d have yourself a nice trend. A cherry-flavored one. People might even pay you for it. Just make them forget about the cycle between the 2:43s.
I predict you can get lots of funding if you suggest that your predictions will lead to the destruction of mankind. It worked for Ehrlich and he wasn’t even right once on any given day. 🙂
Real Science 
Did you adjust for TOBS? 😉
What a pair!
Ray Pierre and Naomi!
If a rock was present they could claim the intelligence of a rock in the group.
And if you only looked at the clock at 2:43, you’d have yourself a nice trend. A cherry-flavored one. People might even pay you for it. Just make them forget about the cycle between the 2:43s.
I predict you can get lots of funding if you suggest that your predictions will lead to the destruction of mankind. It worked for Ehrlich and he wasn’t even right once on any given day. 🙂
What happens if the clock stops?
Then the clock is still correct twice A day, like the IPCC.
LOL…..:)
Where’s the link to the Clock model
Naomi Oreskes’ observation that: “climate scientists are so busy talking about stuff they don’t understand
Did I cut and paste that Oreskes quote correctly?