The Racism Never Ends With Progressives

If a black teen is shot by a white policeman, progressives know that it is automatically a racist act

ScreenHunter_7954 Mar. 16 02.36

If white cops gets shot by a black teen, the press won’t even mention it.

ScreenHunter_7952 Mar. 15 21.25

If Middle East Muslims rape white girls, the press calls them Swedish

ScreenHunter_7955 Mar. 16 02.53

White progressives believe that they are superior to everyone else. White progressives believe that people of color can’t control themselves and are not responsible for their own behavior. White progressives believe that they have to lie about everything, because no one else can handle the truth.

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to The Racism Never Ends With Progressives

  1. au1corsair says:

    It occurred to me that white progressives practice their lies in a mirror–because they cannot stand it when they practice truth in front of the mirror. White progressive hate is self-hate.

    • AndyG55 says:

      “White progressive hate is self-hate.”

      And hate for everyone around them.

    • chick20112011 says:

      I also believe that these progressives believe that because they are facilitators and co-conspirators that they will be spared when the dog poop hits the fan.

      • Gail Combs says:

        They didn’t learn from the Russian Intelligentsia.

        Attacks on Intelligentsia: Early Attacks

        In the years immediately following their accession to power in 1917, the Bolsheviks took measures to prevent challenges to their new regime, beginning with eliminating political opposition. When the freely-elected Constituent Assembly did not acknowledge the primacy of the Bolshevik government, Vladimir Lenin dissolved it in January 1918. The Left Socialist Revolutionary Party, which protested the action, withdrew from the Bolshevik coalition in March, and its members were automatically branded enemies of the people. Numerous opposition groups posed military threats from various parts of the country, placing the survival of the revolution in jeopardy. Between 1918 and 1921, a state of civil war existed.

        Bolshevik policy toward its detractors, and particularly toward articulate, intellectual criticism, hardened considerably. Suppression of newspapers, initially described as a temporary measure, became a permanent policy. Lenin considered the Constitutional Democrats (Kadets) the center of a conspiracy against Bolshevik rule. In 1919, he began mass arrests of professors and scientists who had been Kadets, and deported Kadets, Socialist Revolutionaries, Mensheviks, and Nationalists. The Bolshevik leadership sought rapidly to purge Russia of past leaders in order to build the future on a clean slate….
        http://www.ibiblio.org/expo/soviet.exhibit/attack.html

        A more sanitized version.
        http://www.historytoday.com/christopher-read/russian-intelligentsia-and-bolshevik-revolution

  2. Let’s refine the target here…this is the progressive ‘meejia’.
    True scum, because they have no actual values and are only interested in divisive, hate inducing headlines.
    Let’s not follow them down that same filthy street!

    • Gail Combs says:

      Steve hasn’t even touched the true horror of the Media/gov’t cover-ups.

      The unethical count on Christians turning the other cheek. The Muslims count on the Poltically Correct governments and new media to cover up their crimes as they did for years in Rotherham: 1400 Children Groomed, Drugged and Raped by Multiculturalism And that is just ONE town!

      The full story is more shocking than you can possibly imagine, not just because of the ugliness of the abuse itself (redolent of that horrible scene from the movie Taken where smack-addled girls are serially abused in a filthy dive by countless grubby men) but also because of the extent of the cover-up by the left-liberal establishment of social workers, local government officers, child welfare charities, diversity co-ordinators, not to mention the regional police forces and even imams.

      The rape gang phenomenon has existed in the UK for at least 25 years….

      These practices have long been widely known to the police, to social workers, to child-care charities and local councils. All found an excuse to absolve the rape gangs of criminal behaviour by claiming that these sexual activities were consensual – ie that these girls, some as young as 11, were sluts who had it coming to them.

      Each child is worth about £200,000 (around $300,000) a year to the gangs – which makes them even more lucrative than the drugs trade.
      …. http://www.teaparty.org/islamic-rape-gangs-rotherham-just-tip-iceberg-54359/#sthash.9g7NrkTi.dpuf

      And if that isn’t disgusting enough…

      Muslim Rape Gangs: the Disturbing Role of Britain’s Leading Child Welfare Charity

      Among the more nauseating spectacles of the Rotherham child rape scandal has been the squirming evasion and shameless attempts at face-saving by the various authority figures whose job it supposedly was to prevent such horrors happening.

      One of them is a man named Javed Khan. He is the head of Britain’s largest children’s charity Barnardo’s which now stands accused of having known about the Muslim rape gang problem for well over a decade – but which chose to do next to nothing to confront it….

      What McCloughlin clearly demonstrates in his report is that Barnardo’s knew for years what was going on. How could it not? As it boasts in Puppet On A String, Barnardo’s is “the main provider of child sexual exploitationservices in the UK”, with 22 “specialist services”in this field. It will have encountered hundreds, if not thousands, of girls who have fallen victim to Muslim rape gangs. Some of these victims’ stories are told in the Barnardo’s report. But with one key detail mysteriously excised: the religious or ethnic identity of the perpetrators.

      McCloughlin lists numerous occasions when Barnardo’s could have spoken up but didn’t.

      Why in 2004, when a Channel 4 documentary on the subject was shelved at the request of the Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police, did Barnardo’s not complain?

      Why, when local MP Ann Cryer raised the issue in 2003 – and was vilified as a racist – did not Barnardo’s rise to her defence?

      Why didBarnardo’sremain silent in 2004 when BradfordCouncil and West Yorkshire Police stated there was “no evidence”that these grooming gangs existed?

      How didBarnardo’srespond in 2005 when West Yorkshire Police closed down their investigation intothe grooming gangs?

      Why when Julie Bindel bravely wrote about the subject in 2007 did Barnardo’s not back her up?
      …clearly, the culture of complacency, political correctness and head-in-the-sand-burying existed at Barnardo’s long before Javed Khan was appointed its Chief Executive last year.

      But the fact that it chose such a man for the £150,000 pa job speaks volumes about its priorities. Certainly, Khan’s colourless, evasive, shifty performance in his Sky News interview would suggest that it wasn’t raw talent, intelligence or charisma that landed this impeccably Muslim, career lefty quangocrat the position. And to judge by this recent story in the Daily Mail, it probably wasn’t his probity either.

      The head of Victim Support, the Government-backed charity for people affected by crime, has been accused of taking an armed gang to settle a long-running land dispute in his native Pakistan.Javed Khan is reported to have arrived in the village of Haveli Bagal last week with about eight men armed with automatic rifles.

      Witnesses claim that one middle-aged woman who tried to stop the gang from bulldozing a contested wall of the village graveyard was threatened by the charity chief and that shots were fired in the air.Mr Khan spent several hours at a local police station as officers tried to resolve the row…..

      Aren’t you SO glad you’re paying this guy’s £150,000 salary with your taxes and so relieved he’s now the chief guardian of British children’s welfare? …..

  3. tabnumlock says:

    The Swedish press routinely uses silhouettes of white people in place of black and Muslim mug shots. They also lighten the skin color in photos of black criminals. You can google these if you want a chuckle.

    • au1corsair says:

      In the Sixties, George Zimmerman would have been classified as a black man by the same party controlling the federal investigation into Trayvon Martin’s shooting death. Now our current president can be called “Irish.” The Swedish press has nothing on America!

  4. gator69 says:

    My local news stations conveniently ‘forget’ to show mug shots of Obama sons on a regular basis, and when describing perps, it often goes like this, “The suspect is described as a man with a blue ball cap, red jacket, scar on left cheek and about 5’9″ tall. He also walks with a limp and is missing part of his left index finger

  5. D. Self says:

    But now the Media spin in Ferguson is the perp wasn’t shooting at the cops but someone else. Amazing Shat! Make a judgement call before the facts are out but that is what we have with the State Run Media.

    • au1corsair says:

      Neat! Three shots at 125 yards and two solid hits. Aiming elsewhere. Using a gun standard to our “racist militarized cops.” Were the bullets self-guided homing warheads? That’s damned good shooting! Especially when aiming in another direction.

  6. Climatism says:

    Tuck yourself into this fella. Tell me what you think.

  7. annieoakley says:

    Blocked for me.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s