Biggest Fraud In Science History – The NASA/NOAA Surface Temperature Record

Over the last ten years, satellites show that the Earth is cooling. But that doesn’t suit the needs of the climate criminal community ahead of their convention in Paris this year, so NASA/NOAA created a completely fake surface temperature record – which is diverging from satellite temperatures at a rate of two degrees per century

ScreenHunter_243 Jul. 24 19.38

Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs

There isn’t one smidgen of legitimacy to the NASA/NOAA temperature record, but current their job is to create propaganda for the White House.

This fraud is nothing new for them, as they have been altering their own data for decades to create the impression of imaginary global warming. They have doubled 1880-1980 warming since Hansen 1981.


And their fraudulent temperature record looks nothing like the 1975 National Academy of Sciences graph.


They are able to get away with this, because they have many criminals in government and the press backing them up in this fraud, and believe they can do whatever they want and get away with it.

If they weren’t crooks, they would be very concerned about the discrepancy versus satellite data. But they don’t even mention it. A dead giveaway of their mindset..

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

42 Responses to Biggest Fraud In Science History – The NASA/NOAA Surface Temperature Record

  1. tomwys1 says:

    I addressed the NASA/NOAA temperature “problems” in my “Measuring the Measurements” talk, at Heartland’s ICCC-10 last month. The link goes directly to my portion, but you can easily scroll back to see the rest, and I have a part in the Q&A that follows where the underpinnings of their new NASA/NOAA temperature “record” are addressed:

    In the Q&A portion from 103:44 to 106:09, I refer to the Karl study which was suggesting that the atmospheric temperature “pause” or “hiatus” should be questioned. There is NO other previous data set that agrees with this study!!! My reply to the question gives an explanation as to why this “study,” unsupported by other examples, has major faults.

    • flow in says:

      why do people consider CO2 a warming gas? i don’t get it. Entropically, it can only shunt energy down its densitygradient, as each layer of CO2 closer to earth reflects better than each layer above. It both reflects energy from space, and by the same process, but integrated across the atmosphere, reflect energy from the ground up into space. The only way it could ‘reflect’ back down to earth would be if there was a layer of CO2 up at the troposphere and none below.

      • CO2 doesn’t reflect anything. It absorbs IR in the 15 micron band and passes it by conduction to N2 and O2 molecules (it warms them). After it does that, the 15 mike IR is gone.

        That’s why raising CO2 levels does absolutely nothing. If all the 15 micron IR is gone, more CO2 can’t do anything with it. Steve (Tony) has said this 100 times but the climate goon squad doesn’t understand it because they are dumber than a really large box of really dumb rocks, they have heads with only 10 brain cells, and those cells are really dumb ones.

        • flow in says:

          I was wondering about the ‘reflection’ phrase. It was in that video too. NASA used it when talking about stratospheric reflection of energy by CO2 as well.
          My understanding of CO2 cooling action was to do with moving energy. CO2 moves energy better than O2 or N. as CO2 increases, it moves energy – to other CO2 and to O2 and N, more rapidly than when CO2 is lower. This increase in energy movement increases the rate at which energy is moved along the density gradient, and up and out into space.
          So CO2 is not without action, it is cooling (hence the hard winters)

        • NASA uses the word “reflection” for CO2? I can’t bear to watch the video. I think it should come with a warning, “Caution, this video contains graphic stupidity which may be disturbing for some viewers…..”

          Some of the scientifically illiterate writers used by the Obama administration think that CO2 absorbs photons of IR and re-emits them, and calls “reflection.” I saw Al Gore use this brain fart in his Inconvenient movie. He is a complete moron and anybody who thinks this actually happens is not a scientist. Not even close.

          Think of all the time we’ve wasted with glass mirrors and metal mirrors, when we could have been making them out of CO2 all this time. Who knew?

        • Marsh says:

          I have to agree with you Morgan,, of course, the Global Warming premise is founded on this fictitious CO2 theory. In some ways, it’s obvious that mankind is still primitive with such a herd mentality ; they follow the fraudsters like lambs to the slaughter.

        • Even if they don’t use the word reflection, just the concept of absorption and re-radiation of 15 micron IR photons is something they repeat so often I think they actually believe it. But if CO2 did that, there would be no greenhouse effect. The warming comes from the fact that CO2 absorbs the photon and turn it into heat. If a CO2 molecule absorbs and re-radiates it the photon, it never gets warm in the first place!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  2. omanuel says:

    Steven aka Tony,

    Successive lies to hide earlier lies have trapped seven decades of consensus science liars like rats on a sinking ship.

    • omanuel says:

      Ancient scriptures of various religions teach this unalterable truth:

      Truth is victorious, never untruth.

    • Glenn Festog says:

      See, the problem is that, in the past, the gov and media were able to panic people into action quickly. But 9-11, wars in Aghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere, all turning out to be manufactured crisis’ meant that most did NOT bite on the pro-offered “bait”. Much harder to catch a wary target………..

  3. emsnews says:

    At WUWT, if you type in the word ‘fraud’ your posting is censored. HAHAHA. Also: no apologies there to this site. Today, again, they are discovering the obvious that temperature data tampering is criminal…and if any suggests the criminals be arrested there, the posting is censored yet again.

    Periodically they do allow someone to mention Steven’s site! I was shocked by this, I assumed they would vigilantly prevent anyone from knowing about this site.

    • omanuel says:


      WUWT has had a few consensus science fraudsters there trying to prevent the public from realizing that formerly independent national academies of science (NAS) were merged into an “Orwellian Ministry of Consensus Science (UN)Truths” when nations were united (UN) on 24 Oct 1945.

      That is the real reason for these two early consensus science lies:

      _ 1. The internal composition of the Sun changed from Iron (Fe) in 1945 to Hydrogen (H) in 1946, and

      _ 2. The textbook definition of nuclear stability was changed from lowest value of Aston’s nuclear packing fraction to highest value of Weizsacker’s average nuclear binding energy.

    • Menicholas says:

      I post links to this site there all the time, including two separate ones today.
      Was a discussion of the alterations to data, but they were only looking at about the past 10 or 15 years.
      And I do post comments using words such as fraud…they get tossed to moderation, but appear soon enough.
      I only had a few words of a comment snipped once…but it was clearly against the tone that they request of comments.
      I am beginning to see a lot more willingness to call the fraudsters what they are, and to call the “adjustments” what they are: Lies, by an organized and committed group of people with an agenda.
      At some point, I have to believe that the whole house of cards will collapse.
      When it does, the real story will finally be published in the mainstream press, and people who saw trough the BS, and stood up for the truth and the scientific method, will be seen in a different light than is now the case.
      I am normally not the sort of person who like to gloat, but what karma finally comes around and bites the Warmistas in their lying asses, I will make an exception.

      • gregole says:

        “…to call the “adjustments” what they are: Lies, by an organized and committed group of people with an agenda.”

        Well said. Captures the situation perfectly. And this group is actually quite small – they have simply found a message that has somehow resonated with a much larger groups of people, practically all of them uninformed. When this fraud is finally recognized for what it is, I think it will actually change the world. Governments will fall. MSM is done for. We are in for some big changes.

  4. D.Self says:

    All Liberals believe the ends justify the means. “Morally wrong actions are sometimes necessary to achieve morally right outcomes; actions can only be considered morally right or wrong by virtue of the morality of the outcome” So this is why the “liar and thief” lies all the time because he believes the outcome of the AGW, now AGCC, will benefit the world, actually benefit his party and his donors.

    • gator69 says:

      I believe you mean that all “leftists” believe the ends justify the means. Real liberals like me, believe in liberty, and not fascism.

      Thomas Jefferson was a liberal, and is one of my greatest heroes.

      • Anthony S says:

        Haven’t you heard? Jefferson was an evil slave owner, and needs to be erased from history like the confederate flag.

        HARTFORD — Connecticut Democrats will change the name of the party’s annual Jefferson Jackson Bailey Dinner, stripping the names of two former U.S. presidents who were slave owners.

        • gator69 says:

          This is what happens when we allow leftists to write our history books, and allow leftists to control the language. Jefferson was key in the specific language of our Constitution, which freed the slaves in time, just as he intended.

          I wonder, has it ever occurred to leftists that the stars and stripes also flew over slave states? Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation applied only to slave states, and was used to weaken the South. The Supreme Court had ruled in 1857, before the Civil War, that slavery could not be excluded from the new territories by the Missouri Compromise.

          How sad that most American’s do not even know their own history.

        • Glenn Festog says:

          Most of them don’t know REAL history, just propaganda; like most don’t know that General Lee released his slaves at the beginnings of the War, but General Grant kept his ’til the 13th amendment passed. His reason? “Good help is hard to find.”

      • D.Self says:

        Gator, You got me on the Liberal term before, maybe I learned this time

    • David A says:

      I am sorry, but I do not know the quote.

  5. gator69 says:

    They are able to get away with this, because they have many criminals in government and the press backing them up in this fraud, and believe they can do whatever they want and get away with it.

    Do not give a pass to academia, they are as guilty as anyone, if not more so.

    • omanuel says:

      Regretfully, I agree with both of these posts. Only the most arrogant of fools (aka Joseph Stalin and one notable religious leader) would attempt to forbid public knowledge of the source of energy that created and sustains every atom, life and planet in the solar system.

  6. Climatism says:

    Reblogged this on Climatism and commented:
    Satellite data was all the rage in the 90’s when it ‘was’ warming. Now they ‘deny’ its very existence, because it shows no warning for nearly two decades – completely trashing their scam.
    One obvious recognition of climate zealots, is the very fact they now coin their theory ‘climate change’ – so whatever happens in weather/climate, it’s your fault.

  7. AndyG55 says:

    Interesting.. Kenya pledges to cut their itsy-titsy, teeny weeny CO2 by 30%

    For $40 Billion (after a visit from O’bummer)

    Now which US tax-payer is going to fund that ?

    • emsnews says:

      I pointed this out, too. Steven can’t keep up with the constant flow of funky news! Don’t blame him, of course. It is being hosed at us constantly, the flood of ‘we are roasting to death’ stories and moves by the Bilderberg gang to bribe countries is constant.

  8. It’s stating the obvious,
    But I think you will find
    All you see here is politics,
    Unless you’re quite blind!

  9. Andy DC says:

    I’ve had up to a 12 degrees difference between National Airport’s maximum temperature (Washington, DC) and mine less than 15 miles away. That is on a sunny day with no fronts or storms in the area. That is WAY outside the range of natural variability. They are literally cooking the books.

  10. Centinel2012 says:

    Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
    What we need to do is stop calling the workers at NASA and NOAA scientists and give them their more accurate title of Wizards for what they do has nothing to do with science!

  11. The fraudsters have the backing of Obama, the Pope… and every Legislative body in the Western World… the Governor of California proclaims “apocalypse” and extinction….

    This is all about Politics… Money… and the insanity of Progressives…

  12. mogur2013 says:

    Tony, anyone channeling Judy Garland has got to be a fag. It’s okay, there is nothing wrong with that. We understand, and we care. Just let it be. Click your heels and just say, “I want to be homo”, “I want to be homo”, “I want to be homo”.

    I think Tony maroni just ‘spammed’ me. That is Tony’s euphemism for blocking anyone from his website that he doesn’t agree with. So much for tolerance. So much for his pretend acceptance. NO, he probably isn’t gay. Who cares? You people are really hilarious. Guns and Oil. Got it.

    • gator69 says:

      Faggot, often shortened to fag, is a pejorative term used chiefly in North America primarily to refer to a gay man.

      And in case any other bigots out there do not know what “pejorative” means…

      pe·jo·ra·tive pəˈjôrədiv adjective
      1. expressing contempt or disapproval.

      You can lie and say you believe “there is nothing wrong with that”, but those of us who know that you are not sincere see through your childish attempt at ridicule.

      So good to have you back and discrediting yourself! Please keep posting.

    • AndyG55 says:

      Do you have a blog we can comment on , please !! 😉

    • Marsh says:

      So mogur2013 , your slap to the face tirade, is at least deserving of blocking I would assess. It’s also, weak minded individuals that cannot play the game and debate themselves… will lower oneself to homophobic assertions. Psychologically, this also reflects their own personal insecurities & inclinations to being Gay, you’ve got it.

      Subject here relates to Global Warming Fraud,, can you contribute? Obviously so!

    • AndyG55 says:

      Anyone channelling a whale, probably needs to get a lot more exercise.

  13. 401 goldIRA says:

    Am i legally responsible for content on my blogs & forums that others have written?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s